The Temper of a Leader
I was thinking about the tempers of the folks running in the Primary today and, low and behold, my mom brought up the same thing this evening. She said, "Did you notice McCain, Clinton and Romney all have bad tempers?" I acknowledged I'd noticed that too and was also concerned. Apparently McCain and Hillary Clinton are famous for their violent tempers. I'm not sure about Bill's temper but I know he's been pretty riled up lately on the campaign trail. According to Hillary Speak, "Bill just gets really enthusiastic about supporting me." I think she needs to check out the definition of "enthusiastic". I've begun to notice Mitt also seems to flair up quite easily too when cornered. Edwards isn't bad tempered, he's just found that passion is his presidential selling point. The only candidate who seems to be able to remain honest, rational and calm when sorely provoked is Obama. I've been noticing his ability to absorb, proactively address and productively diffuse or change tense situations all through the debates. That's been one of the reasons I like him so much.
That brings me to my litmus test for a president. I really like the movie "Fail Safe". I especially like Henry Fonda's protrayal of a president who has to make an excruciating decision and who does so with grace, calm and an open minded intelligence. Given an impossible situation in which a jet carrying a nuclear bomb is accidentally sent out to target Moscow, Fonda's president must convince the Russians it was an accident. When the plane cannot be stopped because of strict protocols and it drops a bomb that incinerates Moscow, the U.S. President decides to bomb New York as a show of goodwill and reciprocation. He calmly sends out his best friend and crack pilot to bomb a city both their wives and children are visiting. Fonda's president makes that decision because it is in the best interest of humanity. He doesn't want WWIII. What is so impressive is the calm, thoughtful way this president works through the problems, gains the respect and trust of the Russian leaders, is able to see the big picture, cares about the future and has the strength to make a terrible decision.
My question is what candidate running this year could be a president with similar ethics, character, moral strength, intelligence and compassion as the one described above.
That brings me to my litmus test for a president. I really like the movie "Fail Safe". I especially like Henry Fonda's protrayal of a president who has to make an excruciating decision and who does so with grace, calm and an open minded intelligence. Given an impossible situation in which a jet carrying a nuclear bomb is accidentally sent out to target Moscow, Fonda's president must convince the Russians it was an accident. When the plane cannot be stopped because of strict protocols and it drops a bomb that incinerates Moscow, the U.S. President decides to bomb New York as a show of goodwill and reciprocation. He calmly sends out his best friend and crack pilot to bomb a city both their wives and children are visiting. Fonda's president makes that decision because it is in the best interest of humanity. He doesn't want WWIII. What is so impressive is the calm, thoughtful way this president works through the problems, gains the respect and trust of the Russian leaders, is able to see the big picture, cares about the future and has the strength to make a terrible decision.
My question is what candidate running this year could be a president with similar ethics, character, moral strength, intelligence and compassion as the one described above.

